Limitarianism

Critics Review

• The best case I’ve read for putting an upper limit on the accumulation of wealth. Even the super-rich might be glad if there was a finishing line!

  Richard Wilkinson

• You might find yourself, as I did, underlining a sentence or three on every page, and adding exclamation points in the margin

  Observer

• A compelling case for limiting extreme wealth, along economic, political and moral lines … This argument has never been more important, and this book is a persuasive call to action

  Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst

• Powerful – a must-read

  Thomas Piketty

• Effortlessly navigating between ethics, political theory, economics and public policy, Ingrid Robeyns’ nuanced and persuasive defence of limitarianism is also a much-needed manifesto for reimagining political institutions

  Lea Ypi

• Is it possible to meet the needs of all people within the means of the living planet? Definitely not in a world dominated by extreme wealth, as Ingrid Robeyns powerfully argues. This landmark book combines meticulous logic with compelling personal stories to draw everyone – from the super-rich to the super-riled – into one of the most critical public debates of our times. Read it.

  Kate Raworth

• An urgent, thought provoking treatise that is both a compelling critique of limitless inequality and an imaginative account of a world without the superrich

  Peter Geoghegan

• Ingrid Robeyns has written an essential book from a radical point of view. It is high time someone asked the question, “Is there such a thing as having too much money?” Along with its corollary question, ‘So what are we going to do about it?’ Robeyns tackles both with deep knowledge, experience and empathy

  Abigail Disney, filmmaker, philanthropist, and activist

• Many people accept that there is a threshold that no one should fall below. But few have thought that there is a threshold that no one should be free to soar above. In this wonderful book, Ingrid Robeyns presents a novel and nuanced set of arguments for just such an upper threshold. This is a model of how to bring rigorous analysis to bear on practical issues, and to do so in an engaging, humane and accessible way

  Debra Satz

• Robeyns proves that in a true democracy there are no rights without duties – no wealth without limits. Limitarianism offers a way to re-democratise wealth and thus re-socialise the richest 1%.

  Marlene Engelhorn, co-founder of taxmenow

• There is a limit beyond which additional wealth can’t do much to enhance its owner’s life or happiness. But our economic system generates fortunes far beyond any such limit. Ingrid Robeyns makes a convincing case that an upper limit on wealth would be good for society as a whole and even for the wealthy themselves

  John Quiggin

• Robeyns’ argument that top heavy wealth is sinking living standards for the many, spreading economic fear that authoritarians exploit is sound and her thoughtful ideas for reining in extreme wealth are provocative

  David Cay Johnston, Pulitzer Prize winner

• Limiting extreme wealth is an idea whose time has surely come and Ingrid Robeyns makes a powerful case for why this should be a priority for public and political debate. Limitarianism builds on what the epidemiology shows so clearly – inequality damages all of us and it needs to be tackled with the greatest urgency

  Kate Pickett

• A withering critique of the ethical, moral, and fiscal harms of unlimited wealth concentration . . . [This] caustic but balanced attack offers an equitable economic compromise

  Kirkus Reviews

• A landmark … gripping, riveting, vivid … We need to embrace, as Robeyns so compellingly argues, limits on income and wealth.

  Inequality.org

• She’s done the maths. We need Limitarianism. Urgently

  Irish Examiner